Members clark Posted June 8, 2005 Author Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Até a Lois também Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Big One Posted June 8, 2005 Administrators Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Eis fotos da Premiere de Los Angelis: Carro feio sim' date=' mas funcional! Pq carrinho bonitinho e cheio de frescuras, é pra Penélope Charmosa!!! Até Lex Luthor deu as caras! Kate ´Merchan´ Holmes, sem Cruise ´Credo´!!! Thanks Katie!!! Tá pegando bem, hein Gary!!! [/quote'] Eh Lex Luthor de Smallville..hauahaua...eu não estava reconhecendo... Katie... Gary Oldman rocks...este eh o cara...(pô o cara acabou de acordar) Ateh q enfim uma foto da Premiere sem o Tom Cruise...heheheh... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Administrator Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Tudo que eu quero' date=' na verdade, é apenas ter uma discussão inteligente sobre um filme, e nada além disso...[/quote'] É exatamente o que eu quero. Contudo' date=' o que vejo sendo feito aqui por alguns membros nesses últimos tempos é uma tremenda falta de respeito... [/quote'] Pelo contrário. O problema é que este tópico sofre do mal que assola o forum de SDA: meia dúzia de fãzóides geeks e freaks que acham que forum de discussão é so pra falar bem de determinado filme, só babar ovo, e ai de quem questionar alguma coisa. Se não fosse por mim, Ug ou Solto, por exemplo, isto aqui seria restrito apenas ao clube dos fãzóides. Se o Ug, por exemplo, questiona que não gostou do novo trailer ele não está ofendendo ninguém, ou se eu achei a nova trilha sonora uma bosta não estou xingando sua mãe. Só fãzóide pensa assim. Quanto a eu ser um novato' date=' sim, realmente sou um novato, nessa lista de discussão a respeito do filme, meu caro... Contudo, acompanho a produção do filme desde quando começou a boataria sobre quem iria ser o diretor e sobre quem encarnaria Bruce Wayne/Batman nesse novo filme, o que já faz algum tempo... Acompanho-a desde quando ela ainda se chamava Batman: Intimidation... [/quote'] Eu tbm cara. Talvez até antes. Mas isso não significa que eu sou obrigado a concordar com tudo que fazem. Agora' date=' se queres me considerar um novato e um desinformado só porque participo a pouco tempo desse tópico, tudo bem meu caro, nada posso fazer a esse respeito... A democracia na qual vivemos nos permite ter opiniões próprias, graças a Deus... Contudo, o bom-senso diz que devemos respeitar a opinião alheia, algo que não vejo em muitas pessoas por aqui....Sunderhus[/quote'] Com certeza, os fãzóides deveriam aprender a respeitar a opinião dos não fãs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members sunderhus Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Tudo que eu quero' date=' na verdade, é apenas ter uma discussão inteligente sobre um filme, e nada além disso...[/quote'] É exatamente o que eu quero. Contudo' date=' o que vejo sendo feito aqui poralguns membros nesses últimos tempos é uma tremenda falta de respeito... [/quote'] Pelo contrário. O problema é que este tópico sofre do mal que assola o forum de SDA: meia dúzia de fãzóides geeks e freaks que acham que forum de discussão é so pra falar bem de determinado filme, só babar ovo, e ai de quem questionar alguma coisa. Se não fosse por mim, Ug ou Solto, por exemplo, isto aqui seria restrito apenas ao clube dos fãzóides. Se o Ug, por exemplo, questiona que não gostou do novo trailer ele não está ofendendo ninguém, ou se eu achei a nova trilha sonora uma bosta não estou xingando sua mãe. Só fãzóide pensa assim. Quanto a eu ser um novato' date=' sim, realmente sou umnovato, nessa lista de discussão a respeito do filme, meu caro... Contudo, acompanho a produção do filme desde quando começou a boataria sobre quem iria ser o diretor e sobre quem encarnaria Bruce Wayne/Batman nesse novo filme, o que já faz algum tempo... Acompanho-a desde quando ela ainda se chamava Batman: Intimidation... [/quote'] Eu tbm cara. Talvez até antes. Mas isso não significa que eu sou obrigado a concordar com tudo que fazem. Agora' date=' se queres me considerar um novato e umdesinformado só porque participo a pouco tempo desse tópico, tudo bem meu caro, nada posso fazer a esse respeito... A democracia na qual vivemos nos permite ter opiniões próprias, graças a Deus... Contudo, o bom-senso diz que devemos respeitar a opinião alheia, algo que não vejo em muitas pessoas por aqui.... Sunderhus [/quote'] Com certeza, os fãzóides deveriam aprender a respeitar a opinião dos não fãs. Concordo contigo, meu caro... O que digo, aqui, não é uma questão de que sua opinião a respeito do filme vem a ofender... Todos os membros tem todo o direito de gostar ou não do filme, contudo, o que vejo é um desrespeito a opinião alheia, com pessoas xingando uns aos outros, acusando uns aos outros de idiotas e babacas (e eu mesmo em certo momento acabei fazendo isso)... Você tem todo o direito de não gostar do filme, concordo plenamente... Até eu, que sou fã de Batman, posso vir a postar algo que eu não goste no filme (o Bat-Tanque é um deles, por exemplo, mas adotei a atitude de esperar até o filme estrear para ver como ele se comporta dentro de Gotham, ao invés de continuar criticando e chovendo no molhado)... Agora, algumas palavras que, não só você, mas outras pessoas utilização ao tecerem suas críticas acabam sendo completamente ofensivas aos outros membros, e isso é o que me irrita... Sunderhus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Big One Posted June 8, 2005 Administrators Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Mais uma crítica positva adicionada no Rotten...ainda eh cedo...deve chegar por volta de 150 reviews. RATING: FRESH READING: 77% (FRESH = 60% or Greater) Reviews counted: 13 Fresh: 10 Rotten: 3 Average Rating: 7.1/10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Administrator Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Na verdade eu acho difícil que este filme supere o Batman - O Retorno. Embora eu reconheça suas falhas' date=' acho este um filme maravilhoso... [/quote'] é uma opinião bastante pessoal, tenho sérias ressalvas com aquele filme, do tipo que não dá pra ser fã com mais de 12 anos. mas respeito. diga o que voce gostaria de esperar de um filme como batman begins? TODAS as opiniões são pessoais. Não pense que não... Eu já acho que não da pra ser fã de quadrinhos com mais de 12 anos, mas respeito também. Eu reconheço que Batman - O Retorno é um guilty pleasure, mas nenhum filme de quadrinho que eu vi até hoje (espero que Sin City mude isso) contém questões que eu considere válidas para adultos. Ademais, aquele tem Michelle Pfeifer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Administrator Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Concordo' date=' e eu já devo ter comentado aqui que os filmes do Burton só empolgaram quando eu era criança. Hoje acho apenas BONS filmes, nada mais. [/quote'] Eu também os considero apenas BONS filmes. Mas gosto bastante... E o que o Maul falou eu assino embaixo: vcs realmente acha que este filme vai ser mais do que bom? Espero estar enganado, mas... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members begins Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 BATMAN BEGINS BATMAN BEGINS , USA , 2005, MPAA Rating : PG-13 for intense action violence, disturbing images and some thematic elements Superheroes say much about the culture that spawned them, and so it is with the various incarnations of Batman. In the 60s, he was a pop icon with more than a little camp fluttering around his satin go-go boots. In the 80s and 90s, it was a wallow in excess with sets that duked it out with the actors for attention and villains that out-cartooned the cartoons on which they were based. For the millennium, there is BATMAN BEGINS, wherein the Dark Knight is re-imagined as a ninja warrior going on an inner journey from the darkness to the, well, if not light exactly, at least enlightenment, though even that proves to be a murky sort of place for Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale). The darkness is brought on by two traumas to the young Bruce, a rich kid whose best friend is the maid’s daughter, Rachel (Katie Holmes as the grown up version), and whose parents are not just the perfect couple and the perfect parents, they’re also socially responsible. It’s a quality Bruce has trouble clinging to after falling down a well where he’s terrified by the bats he’s riled up, and later, when he sees his parents gunned down in a classic senseless street crime. Fortunately, Bruce still has the family’s faithful butler, Alfred (Michael Caine as a dryly witty Jiminy Cricket) to play surrogate father, but it’s not enough to counter his inner demons. Bruce drifts emotionally and spatially, eventually ending up in an Asian prison, from which he’s sprung by a mysterious, and surprisingly nattily attired Brit (Liam Neeson), who, with the help of a traditionally black-clad ninja troop, challenges him to confront his fears and turn them to his advantage. For a film that is a frank meditation on the difference between anger and fear, and between justice and revenge, there is refreshingly little speechifying once Bruce leaves the secret fortress of the League of Shadows, where he’s trained in the kinds of martial arts designed to dazzle, debilitate, and defeat any number of enemies. Actually, there’s refreshingly little there, either. Christopher Nolan, director and co-writer David S. Goyer, remains true to the action component of the story, but that doesn’t stop him from elevating it, turning the action sequences into credible externalizations of Bruce’s inner turmoil. In fact, using a palette suffused with shadows and a chronology that is emotionally, if not temporally, true, traversing the inner emotional landscape rife is a far more dangerous proposition than doing battle with Gotham’s crime lord, played by Tom Wilkinson as satisfied and sleek as a prosperous sewer rat. Nolan and Goyer have also, while not eschewing the fantasy elements involved, put a sense of the real world into this Batman. Bruce may have the reflexes of a warrior god, but he hasn’t thought about what happens when his run-ins with the bad guys lead to a fall from a very high place. That’s when the cape that doubles as a parachute is added to the light body armor and other golly gee whiz gadgets dreamed up by Lucius Fox (Morgan Freeman in self-deprecating Buddha mode), Wayne Enterprises R&D guy. There are a few clunks. It’s virtually impossible to see Neeson training Bale in the niceties of using a samurai sword and not flash onto his character in THE PHANTOM MENACE. The evil psychiatrist, Dr. Crane (Cillian Murphy), who runs the deliciously monikered Arkham Asylum, looks to be all of 20, and Gary Oldman, decked out in nerd finery circa 1975, is wasted as the essentially bland Sgt Gordon, the one good cop in Gotham’s otherwise rancid police department. Bale, fortunately, is not a clunk. Suitably brawny and with the lips to carry off the mask, he isn’t asked to chew the scenery with his angst. Instead, subtlety is the key here and Nolan has Bale make a credible transition from narcissistic grief to a troubled introspection that stops just short or actual happiness. Gimlet-eyed behind the mask, with a voice pitched low into a menacing rasp that his as intimidating as the ninja star Bruce has modified into a bat shape, or any of the other weapons in his utility belt. And there is a nice rapport with Caine, who never coddles his charge, but does fret about things such as coming up with a credible explanation for the injuries Bruce suffers after a night of crime fighting. Much of the fun of BATMAN BEGINS is watching the pieces fall into place: the bat cave that becomes the Bat Cave, and the way Bruce’s eyes light up when he first sees what will become the Batmobile. But along with the fun, and there's plenty of that, there's a level of sophistication not seen before in this film franchise, a willingness to ponder the big questions and to respond to some of them with an answer that is bittersweet. My rating: http://www.killermoviereviews.com/main.php?nextlink=display& amp;dId=586&subLinks= Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members begins Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 REVIEW: BATMAN BEGINS (2005)Source:David Server - DV-H! Staff6th June 2005 05:05 PM Asmany of you know, summer movie season is upon us, and here to kick itoff is the Caped Crusader himself, in director Chris Nolan’s Batman Begins.Many fans and casual filmgoers alike will be curious to see this latestentry in the bat-franchise, as the last series of Bat-flicks startedwith a bang under the genius direction of famed wacko Tim Burton, butfizzled to a mind-numbingly terrible close with Joel Schumacher’sdreadful Batman & Robin (the infamous ‘bat-nipples’ are now a thing of legend, so let’s not beleaguer them here…). Suffice to say, it was time for a reboot, and DC and Warner Brothersmade a series of increasingly clever moves in their attempt to relaunchthe dead franchise. They hired screenwriter (and consummate fanboy)David Goyer to pen the script. They brought on talented newcomer ChrisNolan (Memento)to direct. And last but not least, in a practically unprecedented nodof approval to fanboy dreamcasting, they selected actor Christian Bale (American Psycho)to portray the Dark Knight himself, and proceeded to surround him withA-list actors in the supporting parts. Seems to me there’s no way thiscould go wrong. Well, sadly, that’s not entirely true. While Batman Beginsis ambitious in its attempt to create a complex, dark, and realisticnew take on the Batman-mythos, the final product is hit-or-miss, withenough problems to prevent it from being the definitive take on theDark Knight.The film begins with Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) traveling abroad asan enraged adult, blindly seeking vengeance for his parents’ murderwhen he was a child. After being freed from a derelict prison in theFar East, Bruce is recruited by Ducard (Liam Neeson) to join the Leagueof Shadows, an elite ninja crime-fighting organization headed by themysterious Ra’s Al Ghul (Ken Watanabe). After training with the Leagueand learning the importance of fear, varied combat, and of course,theatricality, Bruce discovers that the League’s next plan is todestroy Wayne’s home, Gotham City, as punishment for its unparalleledcorruption. After refusing to join their plot, Bruce quite literallyblows the coop, and returns to Gotham to restore justice and order withhis newfound skills.Upon arriving, Bruce is greeted by his longtime butler and faithfulservant Alfred Pennyworth (Michael Caine), who resituates Bruce to thecorruption that has flourished in Gotham during his time abroad. Wethen begin to meet the remaining cast of characters: Rachel Dawes(Katie Holmes), assistant DA and Bruce’s former flirtation, Lt. JamesGordon (Gary Oldman), the only good cop left in Gotham, Carmine Falcone(Tom Wilkinson), the deadly crime-boss who owns most of Gotham, LuciusFox (Morgan Freeman), head of the R&D division at WayneEnterprises, and Dr. Jonathan Crane (Cillian Murphy), head ofpsychiatrics at Arkham Asylum, who is more than he appears to be.The film is clearly the work of talented craftsmen, but it tries sohard to squeeze in so much backstory and realism that it squeezes out alot of the fun. Batman’s new origin with Ra’s Al Ghul seems rushed, butat the same time, we already take at least an hour to get to the firstappearance of the Dark Knight in his full costume (it’s worth notingthat Batman himself is in surprisingly little of the film). Some of theideas here are great, and deserve more time, such as the emotionallycompelling conflict between Bruce and the sleazy Carmine Falcone, orthe sinister experiments being done behind closed doors at Arkham byDr. Crane. Meanwhile, other plots (that later expand to take over thefilm), such as the continuing conflict with the League of Shadows,which de-evolves into a very standard-fare doomsday device cliché, seemsilly and over-the-top by comparison. Ultimately, only half of theideas present seem to coalesce within the Batman mythology, whileothers seem at best tangential, and at worst, forced and far-fetched. Iimagine a much better, leaner film could have been made with only halfthe ideas present in this movie. As it stands, you’re so busy trying tokeep up that the film rarely stops to relish the bits that are meant tobe heart-pounding and entertaining. The film could have retained itsdark and respectful tone without sacrificing the excitement the genreis known for.The performances are largely not at fault, as the cast is, aspreviously mentioned, top notch. No one is poor in the film, onlyunderused. Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne is solid, if somewhatunderwhelming. Personally, I found that in a movie insisting that BruceWayne is the façade and Batman the true underlying personality, Bruceseemed awfully emotionally balanced and in control. That quibble aside(one I find to be largely significant to their problematiccharacterization), which is admittedly more against the script than theactor, Bale’s performance as Wayne is heartfelt and well performed. HisBatman is appropriately menacing, despite his brief amount ofscreentime. The true strength here comes from the supporting cast.Michael Caine is great as Alfred Pennyworth, imbuing the famed Butlerwith an emotional core rarely seen in other interpretations of thecharacter. Morgan Freeman also makes a strong impression with his smallrole as Lucius Fox, both wry and entertaining in his appearances.Cillian Murphy is a diabolical delight as the villainous Dr. Crane,alias The Scarecrow. Truly, his reduced role is the largest crime inthe overstuffed film, as his villain deserved far more time to shine,be it as his crisp yet slippery Doctor persona, or as the drug-inducedhorror that is The Scarecrow himself.Not everyone is so engaging, however. Gary Oldman sleepwalks his waythrough the movie as Lt. Gordon, who basically exists just so he canbecome Commissioner in later films. His relationship with Batman is bythe books, and never anything more than standard. Katie Holmes’ RachelDawes is an obviously unnecessary studio-induced love-interest, and shenever feels like anything more. And Liam Neeson’s role is so fragmentedthat it’s difficult to appreciate the full weight that it’s meant torepresent.The movie struggles to place everything in the real world, so much sothat it sometimes forgets to have any fun. While each bat-gadget isscientifically proven to the point of practically reading you theinstruction manual, they are rarely put to use in scenes that truly getyour blood pumping. In this desperate attempt to situate this newBatman in the real world, we lose some of the gothic mystery that issupposed to make Batman such an intriguing character, essentiallydemystifying the hero every step of the way. Perhaps Batman was meantto remain in the shadows, because seeing all the secrets feels likerevealing all of a magician’s tricks.That’s not to say that the film is completely devoid of enjoyablemoments (such as the revved up Batmobile chase sequence), or evenwithout one or two truly great ones. In a scene that I can onlydescribe as superb, Batman takes down his first group of thugs. Buthere’s the genius twist: it’s shot from the thugs’ perspective. Asthough watching a scene from a horror movie, we see terrified crooksbeing yanked into the darkness with a yelp by an unseen force, asthough they are being stalked by some monster, some deadly creature ofthe night. This scene is scary, which makes it inspired. With thisscene, we finally understand how crooks in Gotham could ever believethat they’re being chased by some kind of animal, instead of just someguy in a bat costume. For a brief moment, the film achieves perfection.The unfortunate downside to this is that when the fighting finally doesemerge from the shadows for the rest of the movie, it’s overly editedand largely unsatisfying. While the previous bat-films may havesuffered stiff fight sequences from a restrictive bat-suit, at least wecould see them. Here, the fights are choppy, disappointing, andunoriginal.Batman Begins is not a bad film by any stretch, nor is it a bad entry into the Batmanseries. While it suffers from some basic structural problems, it hasthe potential to kick off an exciting new branch of the franchise,placing some very talented people in some very key roles for theplanned sequels. And in spite of all my gripes, just the fact thatthose involved have so much respect for the material that they’reworking on places it miles ahead of the ghastly Joel Schumacheratrocities. Some will say that this is the best Batman film todate, the definitive celluloid take on the Dark Knight. But personally,I’ll take the distant glances of Michael Keaton’s Bruce Wayne, and thegrimy streets of Burton’s exquisitely gothic Gotham City any day. Ofcourse, I have no doubt there will be a new threat in this slick newGotham before too long, and my interest is certainly piqued enough toreturn for the next go-‘round, and another chance to steal the crownaway from the Burton flicks. Have they done it yet? I say they haven’t.But I’m still eagerly awaiting the next dark night with this new DarkKnight to prove me wrong. DEVELOPMENT-HELL.COM RATING: out of 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members begins Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 http://www.development-hell.com/review_detail.php?idreview=1 5 o site da critica acima Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members begins Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Galera,acabei de pensar numa hsitoria da porra pa Batman Continues(ou Year TWO,ou Begins 2): Batman continua na sua intensa luta contra o crime em Gotham City.Eis q surge um novo vilãochamado Jack Snipr,q ameaça explodir um fábrica de produtos quimicos.Batman vai na fabrica,enfrenta seus capangas e encurrala Jack.Numa atitude desesperada,ele pula do primeiro andar d afabrica,porem acaba caindo em uma poça ácida.A fabrica explode,e Batman csg fugir,salvando Jack. Dois meses depois,Jack sai novamente para o crime em Gotham,desta vez denominado Coringa,e com sede de vingança contra Batman,no qual,julga ter sido culpado pelo q lhe aconteceu.Depois do desenrola do filme,Coringa resolve da uma surra em Batman.Ja q ele nao tem fisico e porte para o Homem Morcego,contrata os serviços do matador criminoso Bane.Bane tem 2 encontros com Batman de arrepiar.O Pau come.Porém Batman consegue digamos,vencer.Bane não morre,mas se afasta para se recuperar da surra q levou no segundo embate. No final Batman prende o Coringa,porem no julgamento.o vilão se revolta e diz q tem q fazer com alguem,o q Batman fez com ele.ELe tira um pote acido do bolso e atira em direçao de Bruce Wayne.Porem Harvey Dent,grande amigo de Bruce,se joga na frente,ja q v Bruce desatencioso,procurando algo no bolso.Dent acaba sendo atingido,sendo levado para o hospital. As ultimas duas cenas do filme mostram,Dent acordando e olhando para o espelho,fazendo com q a enfermeira desmai.ele diz -Coringa,Batman,ohh,Gotham City.Todos me pagam!! w a ultima,mostra o morcegao observando a cidade,quando ve uam loja eh assaltada,e de longe ele ve,O Chapeleiro Maluco.E da um salto em direção ao bandido.desce,quebra todos os capangas.pega o Chapaleiro e diz. - Quem é voce? O Maluco responde: - sou a mais nova mente criminosa de Gothm e vc? Uma musica de fundo surgi e O cAVALEIRO das trevas,desfere a frase. -I'm Batman!!! e faz gesto como se fosse suspender o vilao,a capa do heroi cobre a cena.e aparece a frase TO BE CONTINUED... hahah digam se nao seria massa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Administrator Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Seria parecido com o seriado da TV, ou seja, muito cômico... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Administrator Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Seria parecido com o seriado da TV' date=' ou seja, muito cômico...[/quote'] Vc jura que leu Ug? Pq eu nem tento, to esperando ele aprender a escrever primeiro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members begins Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 hahahaha vc eh engraçado Darth num quer ler nao leia.to cagando e andando pa vc agora eu vo parar pa escrever certinho pq o titio Darth q le bonitinho. a vai se lasca porra begins38511.8073263889 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Big One Posted June 8, 2005 Administrators Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Ateh que enfim uma crítica que fala bem e mal do filme sem paracer fã e sem ser incoerente com o personagem. David Server, diz que as atuações são ótimas, com um elenco A, nada de novo ateh aki, diz que o Espantalho detona, aliás não li uma crítica sequer falando mal do Espantalho, este personagem promete. Diz que o filme exagera nas explicações das armas do Batman, que seria mais interessante que o filme deixasse algumas coisas sem esplicação pra manter o mistério em torno do Batman, concordo, não precisa explicar tudo, mas enfim, só vendo mmo pra saber qto tempo eles vão dispensar nisso. Por falar em tempo, ele faz a velha reclamação de que o Batman demora pra aparecer, cerca de 1 hora, ou metade do filme, acho isso relativo, pois ser o filme estiver interessante, não fica cansativo, claro que o filme eh do Homem Morcego e todos querem vê-lo mmo. Vale lembrar que no debut movie do Super ele demorou 50 minutos pra aparecer, e eh um grande filme. Que acontece muita coisa no filme, e q eles deveriam cortar metade e deixar o filme mais fun, tenho medo estes "fun" pode significar na concepção dele. Diz q o Lt Gordon, está lá só pra participar de uma continuação, burocraticamente seria, e que o papel do Lian Nesson eh tão fragmentado que eh eh dificil apreciá-lo. E que o maior crime do filme eh não ter dado mais espaço pro Espantalho que eh "diabólico". Por outro lado elogia as cenas de ção, a perseguição do The Trumbler, e critica as lutas, "não originais". A elogia muto a atuação do Bale, outro que vem sendo elogiado em todas as críticas, onde a atuação dele eh apontada como sólida. REVIEW: BATMAN BEGINS (2005) Source:David Server - DV-H! Staff 6th June 2005 05:05 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members clark Posted June 8, 2005 Author Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Recomendo a moderação que faça uma limpeza nesse tópico.Está cheio de posts com brigas e discussões bobas que não acrescentam em nada o tema proposto. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Administrator Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Na verdade eu acho difícil que este filme supere o Batman - O Retorno. Embora eu reconheça suas falhas' date=' acho este um filme maravilhoso... [/quote'] Eu acho que Batman Begins supera Batman - O Retorno... e muito! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Salame Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Parte 3: THE BOF BATMAN BEGINS REVIEW PREVIEW, Part 3 Wednesday, June 8, 2005 Author: Jett Friday, June 3rd was the day of the “roundtable” interviews. On the schedule were most of the major cast (Christian Bale, Katie Holmes, Michael Caine, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman), producers (Charles Roven and Emma Thomas), screenwriter (David S. Goyer), and the director (Christopher Nolan). The interviews would take place at the Regent Beverly Wilshire Hotel, which was the headquarters of the press junket We were not due to start until 3:15 PM, with a 2:45 PM check-in. I spent the day mostly in my room, working on BOF and doing some additional prep for the interviews. Around noon, I packed my gear, checked out, stored my bags, and headed on up to the 8th floor hospitality suite. There, I found the place to be much more active than it was the previous day. Warner Bros. reps and various media types milled around the many rooms doing their thing. I headed into the largest room of the suite - where the Ra’s Al Ghul costume was located - and found myself a place on a large couch. On the wall across from where I was sitting, was a large HD wall TV playing various extended scenes from the film. At first, I thought they were showing a DVD of the film - which fired me up to say the least. I quickly found out that wasn’t the case, although some of the best scenes of the film was being presented. After watching several “loops” of various scenes from BATMAN BEGINS, I made my way into the dinning area where they were serving lunch. What a spread! I filled my plate along with everyone else, found a small table to sit, and enjoyed some very excellent chow. The roundtables were to take place on the 6th floor. I was to be in “group four” and assigned room 617. I left the hospitality suite, walked down to the elevators, and made my way two floors down. I was fooling with some equipment in my bag as I walked out of the elevator, and out of the corner of my eye, I saw someone. My lack of attention almost caused me to run into this person, but I avoided them at the last minute. “Excuse me,” I said as I looked up to find Katie Holmes standing right next to me! “No problem,” she muttered, as she walked off talking to a Warner Bros. rep. I soon found room 617 and entered to find about ten or so other reporters sitting around - and no chairs. I found myself a spot along the table, directly across from where the cast and crew were to be sitting. It was a bit uncomfortable having to stand for an hour and a half, but I actually had a good view of the surroundings. A few minutes after our designated start time, the first pair was ushered into the room - producer Charles Roven and screenwriter David S. Goyer. It was announced that Goyer had laryngitis (which a writer had told me about a few days earlier), and he was indeed speaking in very hushed tones. Most of the questions were directed at Goyer and pertained to BATMAN BEGINS, but also THE FLASH, which Goyer is writing and Roven is producing. “I haven’t even finished it,” Goyer says of the project. “Chuck [Roven] is one of the producers on it. He’s riding me to finish it. Until I finish it, then we’ll get into who might play him.” Ryan Reynolds as The Flash is a hot rumor making the rounds of late. Will he play the Scarlet Speedster? “Who knows,” says Goyer, “he’s not attached.” Roven had high praise for the talent in BATMAN BEGINS. “The actors could take lines, and in other hands, may not be as warm or funny. Their delivery and timing was exceptional. Michael Caine’s timing is incredible. Morgan Freeman’s timing is just incredible, you know.” Everyone wanted to know was about any future sequel. "Who knows, honestly,” says Goyer. “I'm not being coy, but none of us are signed for another yet. We're all sort of waiting to see what Chris wants to do, so we'll see." Roven and Goyer were asked about what kind of mandate they were given by Warner Bros. Says Roven, “The studio had kind of decided - before our involvement - to try revive the BATMAN franchise. And they had been working on it for a couple of years. They knew they wanted to do something different than what the character was in BATMAN AND ROBIN, and they were trying different things - not knowing exactly what they wanted. But when Jeff Robinov came on as president of production, with Alan Horn, they sort of focused on doing an origination story. And when Chris Nolan came in to talk to them - along with David - they too thought it was best to do an origination story. And one that would be grounded in reality. And that’s really how it [BATMAN BEGINS] came about.” For some reason, the abandoned BATMAN VS. SUPERMAN was brought up. Producer Charles Roven says that the script - penned by Andrew Kevin Walker - is “great.“ BATMAN BEGINS clearly shows that there is more life in the franchise. And I think if there was another BATMAN done in the near future - if any of us were involved - most probably would flow from this. Plus, you also have to wait and see what Brian Singer‘s SUPERMAN is going to be. And I don‘t think a ‘Batman/Superman‘ movie is even going to be brought up again until those kind decisions are made.” Says Goyer, “With this new film, we certainly aren’t going to do it for a while. Maybe one day.” (A NOTE FROM JETT : Much has been made of this online, and in my opinion, taken out of context. Yes, BvS was a good script - but it is clearly a sequel to the previous BATMAN films, as well as the Richard Donner SUPERMAN. It was have to be completely revamped - or totally re-written - to fit. I’m not holding my breath here. Clearly, Mr. Roven was simply keeping options open. He never indicated it was in the works.) Roven talked about what Christian Bale brought to the role of Batman. “The thing about Christian that is so amazing is that he has the ability to do all the things that were required of Bruce Wayne and all the incarnations of the character. He needed to be able to give the darkness of the real Bruce Wayne, he need to be able to give the physicality of Batman, and he needed to be able to give the light touch and charm of the public Bruce Wayne. And if you know anything about Christian, he throws himself into his roles completely in every way. Plus, he did a screen test that blew everyone away.” “We wanted to link Bruce to Gotham in a way that had never been done before,” says Goyer. “And we wanted to link his father to Gotham.“ The reason is that it makes Batman’s mission is that much more personal and important. “We wanted to create a character that has a lot of lightness and darkness within him,” says Roven. “Just like the bad guys do. And show exactly how close we are as humans, you know, to doing good and bad. We’ve got them both inside us.” “But Bruce,” says Goyer, “never crosses that line.” Next up was Sir Michael Caine and Katie Holmes. Sir Michael walked in very exuberant, “Hello all,” was how he greeted us as he walked in and sat down. Did you like the movie,” he asked us. “Good,” he said as well all told him yes. It makes our job a lot easier.” Asked if he did any research about the Alfred character, “I did a back story on him,” Caine told us. “I wanted him to be tough. He was a sergeant in the SAS, got wounded, and went into the sergeant’s mess, because he didn’t want to leave the Army. He learned all that serving drinks and stuff and got picked up by Bruce Wayne’s father.” When talk of a sequel was broached, Caine says, “I would like to do a sequel, if there is one. Sir Michael also told us that he’s certainly glad that he didn’t have to wear a costume. “Oh my God, I don’t want to strap on anything. I was a soldier; I couldn’t wait to get the packs off my bags.” He ads, “I remember Christian talking about how hot the suit was. He left puddles of sweat behind him. I liked my wardrobe, I hate even having to wear a wig - it means you have to be on the set an hour earlier.” Caine also commented on Christian Bale’s transformation into Batman. “He was great to work with and he’s dedicated. What he did with himself physically was amazing. I’d seen him in AMERICAN PSYCHO, and he was kind of thin. If I had know about [THE MACHINIST], I’d have completely freaked out! Then I showed up on the set [of BATMAN BEGINS] and there was Arnold Schwarzenegger standing there.” When asked how he would like to see his character develop in a sequel, Caine quipped, “Longer. More screen time. “ Ms. Holmes was a bit more reserved that Caine, many times deferring questions to him. She told us “It was quite a thrill to get the role of Rachel. I really liked her strength,” she continued. She‘s worked for everything she ever got.” Rachel Dawes was one of the few characters created just for the film. Says Holmes, “The back story [for Rachel] was already there [for me]. She grew up with Bruce in that house. Her mom was a servant there. So it was all pretty much there on page. It was fun to think about the experiences her and Bruce may have had growing up, and how that would come into play as they got older. And that came into play in the story.” She too is up for a sequel, “I really liked the story. I’d love to do another one. I loved working on this movie, BATMAN BEGINS.” Holmes also said that she loved working with Cillian Murphy, who plays “The Scarecrow” in the film. “It was wonderful working with Cillian, he’s a great actor. We had a nice time. He was really creepy in the movie. I didn’t like that mask,” she said of the burlap sack Dr. Crane uses. “I mean I liked it, it was just really creepy.” Both were asked of their most surreal moment while working on BATMAN BEGINS. “For me,” Caine said, “was when I walked into the Batcave for the first time. You see, it was a set at Shepperton Studios on a soundstage - which was the first place I ever said a line in a movie. I had eight lines in the picture, and messed up six.” I told them ‘Those are great false bats in the ceiling.’ And they said ‘those aren’t false, they’re real. They are asleep.’ Then the waterfall started - it was a massive set, just massive.” Holmes said that the first time walking into the Gotham City set was her surreal moment. “It is just incredible place. I felt that I was in a real city.” This prompted Caine to interject, “I’ve got news for you about the sequel - They haven‘t pulled that set down. I’ve never told anyone that. It is still there.” “I know,” Holmes chimed in. Caine continued, “And it’s really Chicago, quite weird. Quite strange.” “My respect for Christopher Nolan is quite incredible,” says Caine. “I was intrigued that the man behind INSOMNIA and MEMENTO would be directing a big budget film like this and they trusted him with it - a hundred million dollar picture. But I love it. I’ve seen the picture now and I just love it.” NEXT: Morgan Freeman and Gary Oldman J.C.C38511.9218402778 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Salame Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Concordo' date=' e eu já devo ter comentado aqui que os filmes do Burton só empolgaram quando eu era criança. Hoje acho apenas BONS filmes, nada mais. [/quote'] Eu também os considero apenas BONS filmes. Mas gosto bastante... E o que o Maul falou eu assino embaixo: vcs realmente acha que este filme vai ser mais do que bom? Espero estar enganado, mas... Também espero. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Administrator Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Na verdade eu acho difícil que este filme supere o Batman - O Retorno. Embora eu reconheça suas falhas' date=' acho este um filme maravilhoso... [/quote'] Eu acho que Batman Begins supera Batman - O Retorno... e muito! Vc já viu? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members adam_jones_1 Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Recomendo a moderação que faça uma limpeza nesse tópico.Está cheio de posts com brigas e discussões bobas que não acrescentam em nada o tema proposto. 50% de tudo que há no fórum do cinema em cena é flood ou briga, e nem por isso boa parte são deletados. sem falar naquele lixo do seroni endoreli. acho injusto, mas tudo bem, quem sou eu pra dizer alguma coisa. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members adam_jones_1 Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Seria parecido com o seriado da TV' date=' ou seja, muito cômico...[/quote'] Vc jura que leu Ug? Pq eu nem tento, to esperando ele aprender a escrever primeiro. e voce deveria aprender a ser humilde. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members adam_jones_1 Posted June 8, 2005 Members Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Na verdade eu acho difícil que este filme supere o Batman - O Retorno. Embora eu reconheça suas falhas' date=' acho este um filme maravilhoso... [/quote'] é uma opinião bastante pessoal, tenho sérias ressalvas com aquele filme, do tipo que não dá pra ser fã com mais de 12 anos. mas respeito. diga o que voce gostaria de esperar de um filme como batman begins? TODAS as opiniões são pessoais. Não pense que não... Eu já acho que não da pra ser fã de quadrinhos com mais de 12 anos, mas respeito também. Eu reconheço que Batman - O Retorno é um guilty pleasure, mas nenhum filme de quadrinho que eu vi até hoje (espero que Sin City mude isso) contém questões que eu considere válidas para adultos. Ademais, aquele tem Michelle Pfeifer. bom, nesse caso foi preconceito da sua parte achar que apenas sin city poderá quebrar esse estigma. particularmente vi questões muito boas sendo abordadas em filmes como x-men (preconceito) homem aranha (relação pai e filho (norman osborne e filho)) episódio 3(várias questões, não irei abordar cada uma) e espero que junto com sin city, batman begins, siga o mesmo caminho, ser mais que entretenimento. obs: begins tem katie holmes. obs2: me poupe de sua maturidade. adam_jones_138511.9517592593 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Big One Posted June 8, 2005 Administrators Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Parte 3: THE BOF BATMAN BEGINS REVIEW PREVIEW' date=' Part 3 Wednesday, June 8, 2005 Author: Jett Both were asked of their most surreal moment while working on BATMAN BEGINS. “For me,” Caine said, “was when I walked into the Batcave for the first time. You see, it was a set at Shepperton Studios on a soundstage - which was the first place I ever said a line in a movie. I had eight lines in the picture, and messed up six.” I told them ‘Those are great false bats in the ceiling.’ And they said ‘those aren’t false, they’re real. They are asleep.’ Then the waterfall started - it was a massive set, just massive.” NEXT: Morgan Freeman and Gary Oldman [/quote'] Essa foi boa.....tudo bem, Sir Caine tem créditos... Mais uma crítica positiva foi adicionada...e contando... RATING: FRESH READING: 79% (FRESH = 60% or Greater) Reviews counted: 14 Fresh: 11 Rotten: 3 Average Rating: 7.3/10 "Batman Begins is obsessed with fear from its opening frames, and it manages something that no other film version of Batman has so far: it’s scary." -- Moriarty, AIN'T IT COOL MOVIE REVIEWS Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Big One Posted June 8, 2005 Administrators Report Share Posted June 8, 2005 Recomendo a moderação que faça umalimpeza nesse tópico.Está cheio de posts com brigas e discussões bobas que não acrescentam em nada o tema proposto. 50% de tudo que há no fórum do cinema em cena é flood ou briga' date=' e nem por isso boa parte são deletados. sem falar naquele lixo do seroni endoreli. acho injusto, mas tudo bem, quem sou eu pra dizer alguma coisa.[/quote'] Nem esquenta, já passou, floods são normais e aceitáveis, só não deve se prolongar muito. Agora já voltou ao normal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.