Jump to content
Forum Cinema em Cena

Indiana Jones e o Reino da Caveira de Cristal


joao_spider
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Percebe-se com isso a importancia' date=' o peso e a paixao por muitos em cima do ícone Indiana Jones....possivelmente muitos criticos deixarao a crianca dentro de si  falar mais alto na hora de resenhar sobre o filme...

[/quote']

 

Eu já acho que vai acontecer exatamente o contrário.

 

é apenas uma suposição....como todas que andam cercando o filme....mas elas têm data para acabar...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Segundo o The Raider.net, John Hurt não irá [SPOILER]: interpretar Abner Ravenwood, e sim um velho colega de Indy da época em que ambos eram estudantes de arqueologia e foram alunos do pai de Marion.

 

Seu nome é Prof. Oxley
Rod Keys2008-05-14 12:45:50
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Está sendo divulgado o resultado do costumeiro tracking que fazem para avaliar como há de ser a bilheteria de estréia de filmes. E, para Indy IV, a projeção é astronômica - o cara aí embaixo suspeita que poderá quebrar o recorde de abertura em 5 dias, cujo titular ainda é Episódio III.

 

Steve Mason is predicting that Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull will make $162 - $172 Million in it’s first five days of release domestically.

It opens on Thursday' date=' May 22 at Midnight (Wednesday

night), so this will make for a huge opening day, which I am projecting

in the $41M-$44M range (that includes Wednesday night after midnight

screenings). Then Friday should be $32M-$34M, Saturday will likely tick

up to $34M-$36M and the Sunday leading into the holiday will be on par

with Friday. With a Memorial Day Monday of $22M-$24M, I am calling for

a 5-day gross in the $162M-$172M range.

Jones may come close to breaking the highest 5-day opening gross

record, which is currently held by Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of

the Sith with $172.8 million.

[/quote']

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
  • Members
Segundo o The Raider.net' date=' John Hurt não irá [SPOILER']: interpretar Abner Ravenwood, e sim um velho colega de Indy da época em que ambos eram estudantes de arqueologia e foram alunos do pai de Marion.

 

Seu nome é Prof. Oxley

 

Sim... isso é o oficial, John Hurt é o Professor Oxley. Mas como eles negam até agora que Indy é pai de Mutt (um segredo tão secreto quanto a identidade do Morcego Verde), a desconfiança ainda é livre...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Sobre as "críticas"... se não me deixei me levar pelas críticas positivas de Vingança dos Sith antes de ver o filme... o mesmo continuará valendo para qualquer outro. No momento tenho um feeling positivo sobre o filme, mas é na telona que tudo se desvelará... mal posso esperar... Lucas2008-05-14 15:08:27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

em uma tradução livre dos artigos escritos no ain't it cool news, um dos felizardos que já tiveram a oportunidade de ver o filme confirma mutt como filho de indiana jones....mas vai saber...e mais, ele relaciona seus preferidos na ordem:

 

1º Arca Perdida

2º Templo da Perdição

3º Caveira de Cristal

4º Última Cruzada

 

mas é claro...é uma opinião de gosto pessoal do autor...
crazy2008-05-14 21:36:44
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Só mesmo Indiana Jones para me fazer aparecer no fórum durante a minha tradicional e anual desencanada do fórum (todo ano quando passa o Oscar eu fico uns 5 mêses sem dar as caras aqui).

 

Tou com um pouco de medo desse filme. Sei lá...medo de ser ruim, de ser um fracasso, de eu não gostar, do público não gostar....

 

Tomara que seja um enooorme sucesso nas bilheterias e que seja um filme ÓTIMO. Aprendi a confiar no Spielberg durante todos esses anos, mas mesmo assim eu estou com um pé atrás em relação a esse filme.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

O filme ainda nem estreou e a Paramount anuncia que ja esta trabalhando no DVD do Reino da Caveira de Cristal. Anuncia tambem que lancara um box com a quadrilogia mas nao se sabe se, assim como o box existente, tambem vira um DVD apenas com os extras.

 

Falando nisso o site IESB.net disponibilizou 15 minutos dos bastidores das filmagens, material esse que provavelmente fara parte dos extras do DVD que devera ser lancado em outubro ou novembro.

 

crazy2008-05-15 10:29:17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

MovieBlog.com pergunta-nos:

 

 

Has Paramount Botched The Indiana Jones 4 Marketing?

But hold the phone. If you were 25 or younger… never having

seen the original Indiana Jones trilogy (and there are a lot of you out

there… you don’t know what you’re missing) and all you had to go by was

the marketing for Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

that Paramount has been putting out… you’d think that just another

action/adventure summer film was opening on the 22nd. Just another

movie. Just another film. Because when I see all the marketing for

Indiana Jones 4' date=' I get no sense of it being an event, no sense of

history, no sense of significance… no sense that we are seeing the

return of the greatest adventurer of all time. All I’d be seeing is a

bunch of trailers for an adventure movie staring an old guy with a hat.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying the trailers for Indiana Jones 4

have been “bad”. I’ve actually liked them. But all they’ve done is to

show me that they’ve got a new movie coming out amongst 40+ other

movies also coming out this summer.

I remember when Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith was getting ready to

come out. Not only were the trailers amazing… the marketing for that

movie was very specifically geared towards giving the public a sense of

an event. WE WERE ABOUT TO SEE THE BIRTH OF DARTH VADER! That was the

message in almost everything from trailers to poster to commercials to

cereal boxes. It wasn’t just the MOVIE being promoted…. it was the

EVENT that was being celebrated and we (as movie goers) didn’t feel

like we were being pitched too…. we felt like we were being given

personal invitations to attend the event! Sure the movie itself may

have disappointed a lot of people, but before it opened, it was

marketed as an event that shouldn’t be missed (and with $850 million

world wide at the box office, not many people missed it).

With Indiana Jones 4, it shouldn’t have been any different. This

should have been an event! The marketing for this film should have

focused a lot more on the history, the cultural relevance, the legend

and the legacy of Indiana Jones and the celebration of his triumphant

return! Instead, we’ve got the marketing for just another (although

good looking) action movie with Cate Blanchett sporting a Russian

accent.

So what has the marketing department at Paramount done wrong here? I think a couple of things:

1) I think (please be clear that this is my own speculation)

Paramount presumed that EVERYONE was lining up and dying to see Indiana

Jones 4 regardless of how well or poor the marketing was.

 

They could be forgiven for believing that to a degree since it’s true

for many people. But that thinking fails to recognize just how many in

the movie going audience have never seen Indiana Jones in action

before. It doesn’t take into account those who have, but are now

disillusioned with George Lucas after the failings of the most recent

Star Wars trilogy. As a political analogy, it’s almost like Paramount

thought EVERYONE was going to vote for them in the election anyway, so

they didn’t campaign properly…. I think they’re going to discover that

was a mistake.

2) They failed to address how today’s audience may have a hard time with an action star that is 66 years old.

 

Marketing Indiana Jones as “just another action film” in a summer

FILLED with great looking action films leaves the age thing open to

being a problem. I’ve heard a lot of people 25 or under reference this

very fact. Marketing Indiana Jones as a classic, an institution, a

legend would have done a lot to counteract that. Indiana Jones is

immortal, a character that defies time… it isn’t the PERSON of Indiana

Jones you’re going to see… it’s the LEGEND. Age suddenly becomes a

non-factor.

3) Forget Cate and Shia, everything should be focused on Indy.

 

Don’t get me wrong, I LOVE Cate Blanchett and I really like Shia

LaBeouf… but I think even casting them in this film was a mistake. The

more you bring other big names and big stars into the mix, Indiana

Jones 4 becomes more and more “just another action movie”. Anything

that takes the focus off Indy (other than a great villain) weakens the

“event” feel of the movie in my opinion. Big stars and big names are

GREAT in almost any other summer blockbuster… but Indiana Jones should

be putting as much of the spotlight on Indiana Jones as possible to

highlight the uniqueness of the film as an INDIANA JONES film and not

“just another action film”. The marketing should have been keeping that

in mind.

There was a time not long ago (just weeks ago really) that I was

100% convinced that Indiana Jones 4 would be the #1 box office movie of

2008. However, I also believed at that time that Paramount would start

promoting Indy 4 as the cultural event that it should be instead of

just putting in a half assed effort and making it look like just

another action film. Now I’m not so sure. I’d still probably bet on it

ending up as #1, but my 100% conviction on the matter has dwindled to

about 70% certainty.

Now keep in mind, I still think Indiana Jones will be a great movie.

This post isn’t about how good or bad i think the movie itself will be…

just on how I think the marketing has been mismanaged.

So what do you think? Has Paramount botched the Indiana Jones 4

marketing, do you think it’s been perfect as it is or do you think it’s

somewhere in between? Leave your thoughts in the comments.

[/quote']

 

Gusmão_Raimundo2008-05-16 12:29:56

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

em uma tradução livre dos artigos escritos no ain't it cool news' date=' um dos felizardos que já tiveram a oportunidade de ver o filme confirma mutt como filho de indiana jones....mas vai saber...e mais, ele relaciona seus preferidos na ordem:

 

 

 

 

 

1º Arca Perdida

 

2º Templo da Perdição

 

3º Caveira de Cristal

 

4º Última Cruzada

 

 

 

 

 

 

mas é claro...é uma opinião de gosto pessoal do autor...
[/quote']

 

 

 

Esse já está desconsiderado. Colocar O Templo da Perdição acima de Última Cruzada. 06.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

 

MovieBlog.com pergunta-nos:

 

 

 

 

Não sei, ele aponta algumas supostas falhas no marketing do Indy na opinião dele, principalmente com relação ao mkt para o público "pós-Matrix", de certa forma concordo, sabendo que o filme estréia daqui a uma semana, poderia ter um pouco mais de buzz por aí.

 

Mas discordo da comparação com marketing do "SWIII - A Vingança do Sith", onde ele diz que foi um evento, e foi mesmo, um puta mkt, mas não podemos esquecer que o SWIII teve a vantagem de ter a "SWI - Ameaça Fantasma" e a "SWII - Guerra do Clones" num espaço de dois ou 3 anos preparando o público para o grand finale, o nascimento de uma dos maiores vilões do cinema, Darh Vader. Já Indy tem um gap aí de 19 anos desde a "Última Cruzada", portanto a comparção é descabida porque SWIII veio sendimentado em filmes recentes.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...