Trilogia De Volta Para o Futuro

Jorge Soto · July 6, 2015

pros fãs da franquia, este documentário é obrigatório...

Documentário sobre ‘De Volta Para o Futuro’, ‘Back in Time’ ganha trailer

Publicado em 04/07/2015 por Diego Almeida

Foi divulgado o trailer e o cartaz de ‘Back in Time’, documentário independente sobre um dos maiores clássicos do cinema, ’De Volta Para o Futuro’.

Assista:

O documentário pretende oferecer um olhar sem precedentes sobre o esmagador significado cultural da trilogia ’De Volta Para o Futuro’. A equipe do filme viajou para mais de uma dúzia de estados e passou por dois continentes para a captura de material. Eles realizaram mais de 50 entrevistas com elenco, equipe – incluindoRobert Zemeckis, Michael J. Fox, Lea Thompson, Bob Gale, Alan Silvestri – e alguns dos maiores fãs da trilogia – como Dan Harmon, Stephen Clark, Adam F. Goldberg e Joe Walser.

Dirigida por Jason Aron, a produção no momento busca recursos via financiamento coletivo para ser lançada em festivais de cinema.

Até o momento, ‘Back in Time’ arrecadou quase US$ 7 mil no Kickstarter para sua meta de US$ 50 mil.

’De Volta Para o Futuro’ iniciou a trilogia em 1985 e o segundo filme se passa justamente no ano de 2015. Dirigido por Robert Zemeckis e produzido porSteven Spielberg, contou a história de Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox), jovem que acidentalmente volta no tempo de 1985 para 1955 e conhece seus futuros pais no colégio. Ele acaba fazendo com que sua futura mãe fique romanticamente interessada por ele, mas com a ajuda do Dr. Emmett Brown (Christopher Lloyd), Marty tenta consertar o dano e encontrar um modo de voltar para 1985.

No ano passado, o produtor e roteirista da trilogia ‘De Volta Para o Futuro‘, Bob Gale, discutiu a possibilidade de novas versões da popular franquia.

“Vamos encarar os fatos: já vimos continuações feitas anos depois e não acho que dá para citar nenhuma que tenha sido realmente boa ou que superaram o filme original. Não dá para capturar aquela sensação novamente”, confessou ao site

Yahoo!

Diante dessa onda de sequências e reboots de franquias dos anos 80, Gale foi questionado também sobre o retorno de sua cinessérie, mas descartou retomá-la ou revisitar de alguma forma os personagens de ‘De Volta Para o Futuro‘.

“Não faremos uma versão do diretor, relançar os filmes em 3D ou remexer nos efeitos especiais. As pessoas gostam desses filmes do jeito que eles são e achamos que são realmente muito bons. Então não vamos estragá-los.”

Apesar disso, ‘De Volta Para o Futuro‘ no momento está virando um espetáculo musical. Mas segundo o produtor, a peça só vai estrear “quando tivermos certeza absoluta que chegamos ao nível que queremos”.

Big One · July 6, 2015

O Eric Stoltz não só fez teste como filmou grande parte do filme. Depois foi apagado do filme como na foto..veja quantas cenas ele está no vídeo abaixo:

http://youtu.be/-nYvrS-jlcI

javierlat · July 8, 2015

O melhor é o primeiro. Este ano é o ano ao que eles viajam ao futuro, 2015, eu acho que eu vou disfarçar-me de Marty McFly para Halloween

De Volta Para o Futuro (Back to the Future, 1985) 5/5

De Volta Para o Futuro Parte II (Back to the Future Part II, 1989) 3/5

De Volta Para o Futuro Parte III (Back to the Future Part III, 1990) 4/5

Verbatim · July 8, 2015

Uma discussão interessante sobre o Crispin Glover, no IMDB (quem abriu o tópico fui eu). Pra quem entende inglês, estou postando todas as mensagens trocadas aqui, até porque depois de um tempo os tópicos são apagados desse site. Onde aparecem asteriscos o autor do post está citando uma mensagem de outra pessoa.

Recomendo a leitura na íntegra e que os links do Youtube também sejam vistos inteiros, do contrário vocês não vão entender.

In this interview the actor Crispin Glover talks about BTTF. He says if I recall correctly that the whole story about him wanting to earn more money than Michael J. Fox is false.

I noticed in the sequences they used money in the plot. In BTTF 3, too, since Doc is killed for the same reason.

What do you think? Who is the real s**mbag, Crispin or the BTTF staff?

It's like the Eric Stoltz footage: we'll never get all of it. Bob Gale has parroted the "Crispin wanted too much money" story for so long (over various commentaries and interviews) that it just kinda sinks in. Maybe Crispin did turn them off with his speaking out on the financial gain aspects of Back to the Future. Who knows? Or maybe he did get caught up in the movie's success and think he deserved a big raise.

What do I think? It is ancient history and I choose not to think about it.

All kinds of things go on behind the scenes in getting most movies made, I only concern myself with what the final form of the movie looks like. In my opinion BTTF 2 and 3 didn't suffer by not having Glover as part of the cast so to me it is a non-issue.

We'll never know but he is or seems an eccentric, so I can't really take what he says seriously. Tom Wilson (Biff) said Crispin's a bit different but definetly exaggerates that act in public.

Anyway I'm glad he wasn't in the sequel. I loved him in the first movie but if he had reprised his role, Marty and Doc would have gone back to the 60's to get the Almanac in part 2, which sounds terrible.

Going back to the 50's was a much better idea, so I didn't miss Crispin.

Here's the whole story:

************
Crispin Glover was asked to reprise the role of George McFly. Glover expressed interest, but could not come to an agreement with the producers regarding his salary. Glover later stated in a 1992 interview on The Howard Stern Show that the producers' highest offer was $125,000, which was less than half of what the other returning cast members were offered. Gale has since asserted that Glover's demands were excessive for an actor of his professional stature at that point in time. Later, in an interview on The Opie and Anthony Show in 2013, Glover stated that the primary reason was a philosophical (and ethical) disagreement on the overall moral that the film was conveying.

For George McFly to appear, Zemeckis used some previously filmed footage of Glover from the first film and inter-spliced Jeffrey Weissman, who wore prosthetics, including a false chin, nose, and cheekbones, and used various obfuscating methods, such as background, sunglasses, rear shot, and even upside-down, to resemble Glover. Dissatisfied with the results, Glover filed a lawsuit against the producers, including Steven Spielberg, on the grounds that they neither owned his likeness, nor had permission to use it. Due to Glover's lawsuit, there are now clauses in the Screen Actors Guild collective bargaining agreements which state that producers and actors are not allowed to use such methods to reproduce the likeness of other actors.
************

We can't really say that if he didn't left things would turn out to be worse than they did, even though the sequences are great, this is not a valid argument.

Anyway, I only listened to this interview a while ago, and I find very strange that the producers decided to use money in the plot of both movies after all the problems they had with Crispin.

One thing we forgot to mention was the fact they used the footage from the 1st movie and that Jeffrey Weissman to fool the audience into thinking he was still there. Probably (that's obvious) not paying him for anything. It sounded like a mockery to me.

We will never know what really happened, but one thing we can all be sure, neither one of them are saints.

I am interested to know why the Eric Stoltz footage (if exists, since we only have pictures until now) is never going to be released. Did someone ask Eric if he would agree to this and if his departure from the movie was something so awful that justify this decision?

I'd say they were trying to get him cheap...plus he knew they were filming two movies back to back and just wanted fair pay that his costars were getting. He is a weirdo but it wasn't cool what they did and he made them pay.

Crispin says Bob Gale is the one who continues to spread lies about him:

"even though the sequences are great this is not a valid argument"

It is to me. The 60's idea would be stupid and boring. Marty just trying to retrieve the book from Biff without the fun and danger of interfering with the events of the first movie. Sounds lame. Crispin not doing it made that happen as well as George been dead in alternative 1985 which gave it a unique darker tone. And why would Biff give his younger self the almanac when he's 30? Makes zero sense. At least as it exists he gives his 17-18 year old self it and gives him a few years to hear results for the next few years and realise the book is true and to be prepared for when he's 21 for a great future. I'm glad Crispin didn't do it even though he's great in the first.

I think Crispin Glover got too full of himself and thought he was Marlon Brando. By his own admission he was analyzing every scene and line, proving to be difficult to work with trying to change the focus instead of remembering his lines and taking direction. After watching him on the Sirius radio interview I can see why the director must have got seriously annoyed. They were under a very tight shooting schedule and for the first film, money would have been fairly tight with the studio heads breathing down their necks. In movie production, time is money. When you are churning out a light comedy quickie, you don't want an egotistic unknown actor in a supporting role rewriting the script, analyzing the character's motivation and the scene's focus. They were doing comedy not Eugene O'Neill! No one knew that it would be the enormous success it turned out to be and spawn two sequels. For all they knew it would have been a summer holiday teen movie then straight to video. I guess that Crispin just wasn't a team player. The question is, why was he hired in the first place?

Steve Buscemi's 'Living in Oblivion' was a hilarious 1995 film about a low budget 'one take' filmmaker whose project was being ruined by an egotistical no name actor (allegedly based on a young Brad Pitt) who was ruining the budget and throwing off the other actors by changing every scene and demanding retake after retake because he had thought of another way to play the part.

If they were capable of creating a great story with the absence of Crispin, don't you think they would have done a better one (or at least similar) with him? I think you are underestimating the competence of all people involved in this.

One aspect I didn't like from the 3rd movie was that Seamus Mcfly character. The 2nd also became dull when they decided to cast that Jeffrey Weissman to look like Crispin.

We may deny, but the sequences were affected by this bickering.

I actually think that 1960s would've been much better idea for the Part III instead of Western.

I don't think the western idea was bad. Actually it was even better than what they did in the 2nd movie. What spoils that third movie is the romance between Clara and Emmett.

Here's what think really happened:

Bob Gale and Robert Zemeckis originally wanted Michael J. Fox for the role, but he was unavailable because of "Family Ties", so to buy themselves more time to work a deal and to keep the studio from canning the project, they went ahead and started filming with Eric Stoltz, going through the charade of filming almost the entire movie with what was essentially Fox's stand-in. Then when they finally scored a deal with Fox, they used the "Stoltz just isn't funny enough" excuse to can Stoltz and give the job to Fox.

Crispin Glover was very critical of the way Gale and Zemeckis treated Stoltz and was uncooperative on set when refilming new scenes with Fox. For instance, a close-up filmed during the first production would have Glover looking left, but when it came time to shoot the two-shot with Glover and Fox, Glover would quickly look right just as the camera rolled in order to blow the continuity. Glover was also apparently vocally critical of the ending of the film which seemed to equate financial prosperity with moral correctness, and he thought it was a bad message.

When it came time for the sequel, Glover noticed that he was being offered substantially less than his returning co-stars, so he asked for equal pay. Gale and Zemeckis turned him down, and to add insult to injury spread the rumor that Glover had overestimated his own worth and asked for too much, implying that his demands were unreasonable. Then they turned around and used footage from the first film and an actor wearing prostectics so they could have Glover in the film anyway, which seems like a real slap in the face.

So in the end, I think Glover may have pushed things when he shouldn't have, but I have to respect him for standing on his principles. Gale and Zemeckis, on the other hand, unfairly screwed at least two actors during the production of these films, so I don't think too highly of them at all, but they knew how to play the Hollywood game, so they came out on the top.

Casting someone to look like George and in the way it was presented in the 2nd movie was a low move, that's for sure. It's one thing to cast another dude, but they made it look like Crispin was still there.

That future George walking upside down was ridiculous.

Given what the trilogy earned for the studio, it makes sense for actors to hold out for as much as they can get. Especially if it won't really boost their credentials (since Glover already done one bttf movie). It's not like before the first movie, when it's popularity wasn't assured. the sequels were a pretty sure bet in scheme of things.

If that's true, it's Crispon Glovers own fault. The average person earns between 30 to 40k a year, give or take, and this *beep* wants 125k for 3 to 6 months work?

Greed is what it is. Hell, offer me a movie deal to earn 50k a year, and I'll do it... it's better than average.

I never have understood why actors get paid so much to act? They're not putting their lives on the line, they chose to be actors, so stiff *beep* if you don't get to see your family during shooting, but come on, 125k or more for standing in-front of a camera and speaking the way someone wants you to act? You couldn't enjoy the money and time you have off after the film, to between then and your next film?

I wanna bitch slap people like Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman who wont even look at a script for under a million bucks and then demand millions to do the film... what the *beep* makes them think they're so special and worth that much? It's acting, not saving the world.

I even get sick when I hear a movie coming out cost such and such millions of dollars to make. It just makes me wonder who the greedy prick was who demanded so much to act in the film? A budget of 40 million to make the movie? Or 30 million of it went to some greedy son of a bitch with an ego thinking no matter what they are in, it will make all that money back. Yeah, so the studios make more than the actors, so what, they make movies, thats how they do business and make money to make more movies... but one person thinks they are worth it? get *beep* They need to be kicked out on the street and made to live in the real world for a while to appreciate what you have and what lifes about, not giving them millions so they can live the lifestyle of the rich and shameless.

And the actors strike? HA... i'd like to see doctors and fireman etc go on strike and demand more money and have it given to them then some snobby actor who demands it because he thinks his *beep* doesn't stink.

*******
If that's true, it's Crispon Glovers own fault. The average person earns between 30 to 40k a year, give or take, and this *beep* wants 125k for 3 to 6 months work?
*******

No, he was offered 125K, he wanted more because it was less than HALF of what the other cast was getting who has similar screen time as he was. Why shouldn't he want to be paid equally to his co-stars. Acting isn't exactly a secure job either, right after they finish a movie, they're on looking for their next gig, and it's bad it'll be hard if they don't get anything. Work is competivitive yes, but acting is sometimes even more so and the work is usually very temporary.

You also have to consider that his agent will take a cut of that 125K if he accepts it.

*****
I never have understood why actors get paid so much to act? They're not putting their lives on the line, they chose to be actors, so stiff *beep* if you don't get to see your family during shooting, but come on, 125k or more for standing in-front of a camera and speaking the way someone wants you to act? You couldn't enjoy the money and time you have off after the film, to between then and your next film?
*****

I don't think you're fully aware of the long times and hours it is on set making movies. The days can be really tiring, and hours long. It's not like a 9-5 shift, it can last the entire day. That's not even considering that they would have to go through hours in makeup chair for the old age sequences.

You two have missed my point... They chose to be actors, so not working 9-5 or being with familly is a choice they made... 125k or 250k whatever... Wouldn't 50k be a decent price to take? He'll, actors shouldn't even be paid that much. Do it for the love of it, not the money. If someone demands more, tell them to get lost and find someone else happy to accept what's on the table.

********
Anyway I'm glad he wasn't in the sequel. I loved him in the first movie but if he had reprised his role, Marty and Doc would have gone back to the 60's to get the Almanac in part 2, which sounds terrible.
************

Im not sure if that is true. I read the "60's" script online, and George has an even smaller role then in the final film. In the 2015 scenes he is actually dead from old age or something. In 1985-A he was murdered by Biff, just like in the final version. And in 1967, Marty meets Lorraine, but George doesn't show up until the last minute. I'm assuming that this version was written after it was decided that Crispin wouldn't be in the movie. I wonder if there ever was a story that was written before he dropped out. it would be interesting to see what they did with George.

You're correct about the script. I don't there's a story that was written with a bigger role for George.

*******
They chose to be actors, so not working 9-5 or being with familly is a choice they made...
************

Yes, but they expect to get decent compensation for it, which is usually the case.

******
125k or 250k whatever...
Wouldn't 50k be a decent price to take?
******

Not if you're getting stiffed compared to everyone else. Again, it was LESS THAN HALF of what his other co-stars were getting. How would you feel if you worked for 8 hours and only got 44 while everyone else 88? I'm sure you'd be jumping for joy.

Added to that, $125,000 was the SECOND offer he got. The FIRST one was $150,000. Can you see what's wrong here? The second offer was lower.

******
He'll, actors shouldn't even be paid that much.
******

You mean they shouldn't be compensated for working almost 24 hours a day, memorizing lines for scenes, rehershals and such? Also, doing stuff that's possibily dangerous (Micheal J. Fox accidently got hanged during the third film when Buford's gang hung him at the courthouse). Maybe you should try working the movies before you start saying "They shouldn't be paid that much". Outside perspective isn't the same as inside.

******
He'll, actors shouldn't even be paid that much. Do it for the love of it, not the money.
******

Yeah, they love it. But they also need to pay for food, ulitlites, house, car. You know things, you need to live on. Agents will take a chunck of their pay, then the government will take another. That $50K may be the only pay for the year if the acting gig is 6 months and it's the only thing he gets.

*****
If someone demands more, tell them to get lost and find someone else happy to accept what's on the table.
*****

Which is what they did, by hiring another actor to impersonate him, putting him in makeup and reusing shots that he did for the film without his permission and not paying him for reusing those shots, which in turn caused them him to sue them in court and winning.

Crisp in Glover sounds like a greedy bastard

*******
So in the end, I think Glover may have pushed things when he shouldn't have, but I have to respect him for standing on his principles. Gale and Zemeckis, on the other hand, unfairly screwed at least two actors during the production of these films, so I don't think too highly of them at all, but they knew how to play the Hollywood game, so they came out on the top.
*******

Not necessarily regarding Gale. As a result of Glover's lawsuit, in which Steven Spielberg was a co-defendant, Spielberg got mad at Gale and retaliated against him by buying up a number of scripts Gale had written and then refusing to produce them, effectively blacklisting him from Hollywood.

Falando nisso, aqui vai o link (também em inglês) para o primeiro roteiro (rascunho/esboço) de DVPF 2:

http://backtothefuture.wikia.com/wiki/Back_to_the_Future_Part_II_first%20_draft_screenplay

O arquivo PDF:

http://goo.gl/jVGbDr

Jorge Soto · July 17, 2015

Elenco de ‘De Volta Para o Futuro’ se reúne 30 anos depois; Veja fotos!

Publicado em 17/07/2015 por Renato Marafon

O elenco da trilogia ’De Volta Para o Futuro’ se reuniu hoje (17 de Julho) em Londres, e subiram ao palco da London Film & Comic Con para falar sobre a franquia e relembrar os melhores momentos.

Michael J Fox, Christopher Lloyd e Lea Thompson estavam presentes e foram fotografados.

Confira:

‘De Volta Para o Futuro': O skate voador Hoverboard virou realidade!

O longa iniciou a trilogia em 1985 e o segundo filme se passa justamente no ano de 2015. Dirigido por Robert Zemeckis e produzido por Steven Spielberg, contou a história de Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox), jovem que acidentalmente volta no tempo de 1985 para 1955 e conhece seus futuros pais no colégio. Ele acaba fazendo com que sua futura mãe fique romanticamente interessada por ele, mas com a ajuda do Dr. Emmett Brown (Christopher Lloyd), Marty tenta consertar o dano e encontrar um modo de voltar para 1985.

Documentário sobre ‘De Volta Para o Futuro’, ‘Back in Time’ ganha trailer

Nos EUA, a trilogia voltará aos cinemas por apenas um dia, em 21 de Outubro. Não foi revelado se o relançamento acontecerá no Brasil.

Verbatim · July 17, 2015

E anunciaram pro exterior o lançamento do box de 30 anos em Blu-ray... contendo finalmente a série animada (nunca havia saído nem mesmo em VHS, e agora sairá em DVD), além de mais alguns extras novos:
http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=17187
http://bjc.uol.com.br/2015/07/16/de-volta-para-o-futuro-trailer-mostra-edicao-limitada-com-capacitor-de-fluxo/

O problema é que as transferências dos filmes devem ser as mesmas, pelos comentários o pessoal comenta que nada vai mudar, o que será uma bola muito fora da Universal.

Reparem que o trailer avisando desse futuro lançamento (será em Outubro) está em 480p...

P.S. Ah, e nada do material do Eric Stoltz... esse infelizmente acho que, se existir, um dia sairá, tipo, quando um pessoal aí bater as botas...

Jorge Soto · July 17, 2015

nao curti..

Jailcante · July 21, 2015

Já postaram mais tanto faz. Foto gutti-gutti demais:

S2

Jorge Soto · July 29, 2015

o skate voador vai ser lançado pela empresa de automóveis Lexus no dia 15 de agosto, e vai se chamar Slide... só fica a dúvida se ele faz o mesmo que no filme..

Jailcante · July 30, 2015

Só acredito vendo. No vídeo não mostram o bichão funcionando, mas vamos esperar dia 05...

Jorge Soto · August 5, 2015

ja foi lançado..e pela materia abaixo o trem nao funciona em qq superficie.. :mellow:

apenas onde haja trilhos magnéticos...sabe-se la o q seja isso

http://cinepop.com.br/skate-voador-hoverboard-e-lancado-entenda-como-funciona-101355

Angellus Lestat · August 5, 2015

No dia que descobrirem, se eles realmente existem, como um O.V.N.I. se propulsiona, que não seja em solos metálicos, irão criar este skate também...

Jorge Soto · August 11, 2015

que legal, o lançamento do documentario da franquia será no mesmo dia da chegada do Marty ao futuro, no segundo filme..

http://cinepop.com.br/documentario-sobre-de-volta-para-o-futuro-chega-no-mesmo-dia-que-marty-mcfly-101667

Jorge Soto · August 19, 2015

especial 30 anos da franquia...

http://cinepop.com.br/os-30-anos-de-de-volta-para-o-futuro-102114

Jorge Soto · August 25, 2015

uia, depois do skate voador agora desenvolveram aquele trambolho de exoesqueleto da Ripley, de Aliens

Empresa japonesa vai desenvolver Power Loader de Aliens: O Resgate

Postado por Silvana Perez no dia 24/08/2015

A Mitsui, empresa japonesa de óleo e mineração, anunciou que pretende criar uma versão real do equipamento usado por Ripley

Equipamento foi usado por Ripley no longa de 1986

A Mitsui, empresa japonesa de óleo e mineração, anunciou que pretende criar uma versão real doPower Loader usado por Ripley em Aliens: O Resgate. Anunciado em 2009, o equipamento está sendo desenvolvido pela ActiveLink e pela Panasonic.

Enquanto o power loader completo ainda está em desenvolvimento, a Mitsui já está com a versão menor em estágio avançado. Batizado de Assist Suit AWN-03, o equipamento é composto de uma mochila de cerca de 6 quilos que permite ao usuário levantar até 15 quilos. A companhia adicionará braços e pernas mecânicos à próxima versão do equipamento, que deve estar pronta em dois anos, criando, assim, umPower Loader completo.

De acordo com Tomoya Tsutsumi, representante da Mitsui presente na demonstração do AWN-03 em Tóquio na semana passada, o equipamento foi realmente inspirado no filme de James Cameron: “O que temos em mente é o Power Loader e Aliens”.

Jorge Soto · September 12, 2015

Nostalgia! Trailer do documentário sobre ‘De Volta Para o Futuro’

Publicado em 11/09/2015 às 15:54 por Renato Marafon

‘Back in Time’, documentário independente sobre um dos maiores clássicos docinema, ’De Volta Para o Futuro’, ganhou seu nostálgico trailer.

Os 30 anos de ‘De Volta para o Futuro’

Assista:

A distribuidora Gravitas Ventures agendou o lançamento para o dia 21 de outubro de 2015, mais conhecido pelos fãs como o dia em que Marty McFly viajou para o “futuro” em ‘De Volta Para o Futuro 2‘ (1989).

O lançamento acontece em Video on Demand, Blu-ray, DVD e em alguns cinemas selecionados. Não há previsão de lançamento no Brasil.

No último mês, o elenco se reuniu 30 anos depois. Veja fotos!

O documentário oferece um olhar sem precedentes sobre o esmagador significado cultural da trilogia ’De Volta Para o Futuro’. A equipe do filme viajou para mais de uma dúzia de estados e passou por dois continentes para a captura de material. Eles realizaram mais de 50 entrevistas com elenco, equipe – incluindoRobert Zemeckis, Michael J. Fox, Lea Thompson, Bob Gale, Alan Silvestri – e alguns dos maiores fãs da trilogia – como Dan Harmon, Stephen Clark, Adam F. Goldberg e Joe Walser.

’De Volta Para o Futuro’ iniciou a trilogia em 1985 e o segundo filme se passa justamente no ano de 2015. Dirigido por Robert Zemeckis e produzido porSteven Spielberg, contou a história de Marty McFly (Michael J. Fox), jovem que acidentalmente volta no tempo de 1985 para 1955 e conhece seus futuros pais no colégio. Ele acaba fazendo com que sua futura mãe fique romanticamente interessada por ele, mas com a ajuda do Dr. Emmett Brown (Christopher Lloyd), Marty tenta consertar o dano e encontrar um modo de voltar para 1985.

Jorge Soto · September 21, 2015

Trilogia ‘De Volta para o Futuro’ volta aos cinemas nacionais

Publicado em 21/09/2015 às 18:30 por Renato Marafon

A trilogia ‘De Volta para o Futuro‘ será relançada nos cinemas nacionais, por apenas um dia.

As redes Cinemark, UCI Cinemas e Cinépolis vão exibir sessões especiais dos três filmes da franquia em 21 de outubro de 2015, mais conhecido pelos fãs como o dia em que Marty McFly viajou para o “futuro” em ‘De Volta Para o Futuro2‘ (1989).

Confira o cartaz:

Os 30 anos de ‘De Volta para o Futuro’

A década de 80 foi, sem dúvidas, uma época muito especial para o cinema. Pode ser a nostalgia falando ou talvez o fato de eu ter nascido nessa década, mas a minha lista de clássicos está recheada de filmes lançados neste tempo em que as mulheres usavam ombreiras e muitos marmanjos de hoje assistiam ao Show da Xuxa. E no meio deste cenário, há mais de 30 anos atrás, mais precisamente em 3 de julho de 1985, foi lançado o filme que é o primeiro disparado em milha lista de melhores de todos os tempos: ‘De Volta para o Futuro‘.

Documentário sobre ‘De Volta Para o Futuro’ chega no mesmo dia que Marty McFly

Alguns podem se perguntar o que torna este filme tão especial. Para mim, é o fato dele ter todos os ingredientes para a construção de um clássico:

1) Roteiro quase impecável de Bob Gale recheado de aventura e comédia na medida certa sem precisar apelar para piadas de duplo sentido e capaz de agradar sem restrições qualquer ser humano com pulso;
2) Elenco bem escalado esbanjando talento e carisma;
3) Trilha sonora repleta de músicas cativantes da época e trilhas originais inesquecíveis;
4) Direção inspirada de Robert Zemeckis e produção do “Aiatolá” da década de 80, Steven Spielberg;

A ideia do filme veio após Bob Gale achar um anuário do tempo de colegial do seu pai e ver que ele foi o representante da classe. Ele então pensou se seria amigo do seu pai caso estudasse com ele naquela época. Todas as questões das diferenças entre gerações foram somadas a um elemento de ficção para justificar a viagem no tempo e permitir a exploração dessa ideia de como seria conhecermos nossos pais em sua juventude. Mas é fundamental destacar que as partes da máquina do tempo e da ciência envolvida são instrumentos e não o cerne do filme que, acertadamente, foca em seus personagens e nas suas buscas pessoais.

‘De Volta Para o Futuro’: O skate voador Hoverboard virou realidade!

Todo grande filme precisa de bons protagonistas e esta fórmula é mais uma vez justificada aqui com os atores Michael J. Fox e Christopher Lloyd. O primeiro encarna com seu estilo único o jovem Marty McFly que embarca na máquina do tempo inventada pelo segundo, o cientista Doc Brown, para encarar muitas aventuras 30 anos no passado e tentar procurar uma forma de retornar ao seu tempo. Os pais de Marty foram interpretados pelos talentosos Crispin Glover eLea Thompson, enquanto o vilão Biff Tannen, que era apenas um valentão de colegial e não queria dominar o planeta, foi trazido à vida pelo ótimo e injustiçado ator Thomas F. Wilson.

Claro que não poderia deixar de destacar um dos pontos mais marcantes do filme: a máquina do tempo. Como Marty mesmo disse para Doc Brown, “Você construiu uma máquina do tempo em… um DeLorean”, ao invés de usar a ideia original de uma geladeira (para alegria das mães), os diretores decidiram por um carro com design extremamento futurista para a época. Com “portas de gaivota” e lataria em aço inoxidável, o DeLorean foi a escolha perfeita, deixando todos boquiabertos com suas performances na tela e criando um dos maiores ícones do cinema pop.

Apesar de todos estes motivos, de ter arrebatado as bilheterias arrecadando mais de 350 milhões de dólares (um feito digno de ‘Avatar’ para a época) e de ter aberto espaço para duas continuações bem sucedidas que fecharam uma das trilogias mais celebradas do cinema, faltava um último teste para considerarmos este filme um clássico: o tempo. Mais de 30 anos depois, seu brilho continua intacto assim como a legião de fãs que o assistiram na época e agora o apreciam com seus filhos.

‘De Volta Para o Futuro’ não ganhará refilmagem tão cedo

Em uma época de pouca criatividade em que Hollywood é inundada com remakes e reboots, claro que existem conversas de reiniciar esta franquia. Mas os deuses do cinema estão atentos e o diretor Robert Zemeckis já afirmou que, enquanto ele viver, ninguém irá levar isso adiante. Por que refazer o que já é perfeito? Com todo respeito aos fãs e ao legado da série, seria como refilmar a trilogia clássica de ‘Guerra nas Estrelas‘. Vamos torcer para que Marty, Doc Brown e o DeLorean escapem ilesos dessa ameaça e continuem vivos em nossas memórias sempre que quisermos viajar no tempo sem precisar sair do sofá.

O elenco da trilogia se reuniu hoje dia 17 de Julho, em Londres. Michael J Fox,Christopher Lloyd e Lea Thompson subiram ao palco da London Film & Comic Con para falar sobre a franquia e relembrar os melhores momentos. Confira as fotos:

Jorge Soto · September 29, 2015

Christopher Lloyd revive Emmett Brown em trailer do relançamento de ‘De Volta para o Futuro’

Publicado em 29/09/2015 às 10:18 por Diego Domingos

A trilogia ‘De Volta para o Futuro‘ será relançada como forma de comemoração aos 30 anos, e a Universal Pictures resolveu liberar um trailer que brinca justamente com o novo lançamento dos longas, bem como o novo box de DVD e Blu-Ray, que cherará nos EUA em outubro.E no vídeo, o lendário Christopher Lloyd revive Emmett Brown com o humor de sempre. Assista:

A trilogia ‘De Volta para o Futuro‘ será relançada nos cinemas nacionais, por apenas um dia.

As redes Cinemark, UCI Cinemas e Cinépolis vão exibir sessões especiais dos três filmes da franquia em 21 de outubro de 2015, mais conhecido pelos fãs como o dia em que Marty McFly viajou para o “futuro” em ‘De Volta Para o Futuro2‘ (1989).

Confira o cartaz:

Jailcante · September 29, 2015

Ainda bem que não comprei o box atual de blu ray porque quero esse novo aí.

E Trilogia De Volta Para o Futuro e Sexta-feira 13 sendo exibidos nos cinemas nesse mês de Outubro. Mais feliz não poderia estar.

Jailcante · October 5, 2015

Pepsi Perfect, o refrigerante de 2015, será lançado:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XrwRdzFP-fY

Convenhamos é a única coisa do futuro do filme que daria pra ser lançada agora. rsrs

O resto (jaqueta que seca sozinha, carro/skate voador, tênis que fecha sozinho) vai ficar só na imaginação, por enquanto...

O Espectro · October 5, 2015

Eu acho que carro voador se rolar de existir vai ser lançado lá pra 2050 quando eu que sou um adolescente hoje for um velho .

Jailcante · October 6, 2015

Fizeram o trailer do Tubarão 19 (Sim, foi a Universal que fez, não é fan made)!

Tubarão 19: "Os oceanos estão acabando, e para defender seu lar os tubarões tem que atacar! Dessa vez é pessoal, realmente pessoal!"

Meu Deus! Façam esse filme hoje! Essa descrição ficou ótima! rsrsrs

Jorge Soto · October 6, 2015

lembra do tubarão holografico do segundo filme? ja tem ate trailer..kkk

GilsonDee · October 6, 2015

Soto... antes das 3 páginas de merda que postaram aqui... tem esse vídeo....

mas valeu!

cadê a a moderação dessa merda?!

Jailcante · October 6, 2015

Que nojo! Chuva de spams! :angry:

EDIT: Foram varridos! \o/ Valeus, mods!

Trilogia De Volta Para o Futuro

Qual é o melhor filme da trilogia De Volta Para o Futuro? 72 members have voted

1. Qual é o melhor filme da trilogia De Volta Para o Futuro?

Recommended Posts

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Jailcante

maximum

Forasteiro

Posted Images

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Link to comment

Share on other sites

Join the conversation

Announcements

Qual é o melhor filme da trilogia De Volta Para o Futuro?
72 members have voted